FP&A Transformation does not fail because of the tool

By -
After working on EPM and FP&A solutions for many years, one thing has become clear to me: most planning transformation programs do not fail because of the technology.They struggle because a few fundamental questions are left unanswered during the early stages.
  • What level should we actually plan at?
  • Who owns what - be it assumptions, workflows, admin tasks?
  • Are our hierarchies stable enough to support the build?
  • Is the process truly agreed upon, or are we just automating different interpretations of it?
A good EPM tool can easily handle driver-based planning, workflows, complex allocations, and seamless data integration. But it cannot compensate for unclear ownership, poor master data, or a process that changes across every business unit. This is where solution architecture becomes critical.

It isn’t just about designing cubes, dimensions, forms, and reports. It is about guiding the business to make structural decisions that lead to a scalable planning model. In my view, a successful FP&A transformation starts long before the actual build begins. 

Alignment, Ownership, Data Quality and Architecture are the four primary pillars of any transformation exercise.



#Fintech #EPM #Hyperion #Board #FPandA #BusinessTransformation #SolutionArchitecture




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Groovy Series 1: Groovy + PBCS = New possibilities !!!

By -
Image
Groovy is the buzz word in Oracle EPM world and why shouldn’t it be. With the introduction of Groovy on EPBCS and PBCS+1 cloud options, it has made things so easy that everything seems to refreshed with Oracle EPM. On-premise version can also be enabled for Groovy, but it does not offer the groovy classes available on cloud. EPBCS is the E nterprise P lanning and B udgeting C loud S ervice while PBCS + 1 is the base PBCS service with at least one Oracle module enabled. This module could be either one of Financials, Project Financials, Workforce or Capex.  Having either one of these opens up the system to have groovy capabilities. Having capabilities to code in groovy programming language essentially makes PBCS a mini platform to play around with PBCS objects and anything with the data grid. Long back in the days of on-premise planning, we had the option to provide form validations using javascript which were replaced with data grid validation rules.  Now imagine, hav...
Read more

Using Planning functions with Dynamically created members

By -
Image
Creating members on the fly and Planning functions are no longer a new gig to boast about. In case you still need some hint, please click on above hyperlinks to navigate to Oracle guide to throw some light on them. How about we try to combine the two and come up with a unique requirement where we create a member of the fly and then use it with planning function ? Today I would like to talk about a similar scenario which was more of an attempt to use the planning function to get the start period of a scenario member and drive calculations by scenario start period rather than using substitution variables. This would enable same calculations being executed against multiple scenarios which may have different start periods. We can either have pre-created scenarios or give an option to create one on the fly. Let’s go with second option and be able to run some calculations on a newly created member via form. I created a scenario and enabled it for dynamic children. Cre...
Read more

Dynamic names for export files

By -
Image
PBCS or better known as Planning with the recent rechristening by Oracle, gives us an ability to export data into a flat file using our very own DATAEXPORT command in business rules. Lets see how this command have some interesting feature in cloud version vs the on-premise one. In the on-premise version (the one I am using is Planning 11.1.2.4.004.5 and Calc Manager 11.1.2.4.013.005) if we tried to generate a file name using any RTP, it would not allow us to validate the rule. Let’s say, we ignore the validation error and still deploy the rule, the rule executes but generates the file with the name “VisionData_{Year}.txt”, leaving no option to generate a file which could have dynamic names. Though this doesn’t seems to be showstopper in anyway as the data would have the RTP member inside the file, but considering we like to append date in YYYYMMDD format to the name, it would be impossible. Come to the world of cloud and Oracle has changed the way Calc Manager processes the RTP in the...
Read more