FP&A Transformation does not fail because of the tool
After working on EPM and FP&A solutions for many years, one thing has become clear to me: most planning transformation programs do not fail because of the technology.They struggle because a few fundamental questions are left unanswered during the early stages. What level should we actually plan at? Who owns what - be it assumptions, workflows, admin tasks? Are our hierarchies stable enough to support the build? Is the process truly agreed upon, or are we just automating different interpretations of it? A good EPM tool can easily handle driver-based planning, workflows, complex allocations, and seamless data integration. But it cannot compensate for unclear ownership, poor master data, or a process that changes across every business unit. This is where solution architecture becomes critical. It isn’t just about designing cubes, dimensions, forms, and reports. It is about guiding the business to make structural decisions that lead to a scalable planning model. In my view, a ...